 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Luke W., No. A090906.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a matter involving a juvenile delinquent, a knife found in possession of the juvenile did not constitute a concealed dirk or dagger.
|
|||||
| Israni v. Superior Court, No. D036319.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a condemnation action, trial court's orders granting immediate possession and denying a stay of possession were affirmed. City had an urgent need, providing homeless services, for the immediate possession procedure.
|
|||||
| Perry v. Shaw, No. B133608.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action for medical negligence and battery, jury's award of over one million dollars for plaintiff's noneconomic damages was upheld. Because common law battery was proved, statutory cap on noneconomic damages did not apply.
|
|||||
| Pink DOT v. Teleport Communications Group, No. B141017.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action against a public utility company, claimant was allowed to proceed to trial on action seeking recovery for gross negligence, fraud, and intentional misconduct; exemplary damages were allowed upon a showing the activity was willful.
|
|||||
| Brehm Cmtys. v. Superior Court, No. G027143, No. G027148.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The determination of whether a settlement was in good faith had to be based on competent, admissible evidence, and the settling parties had the burden of proof to establish the value of non-monetary consideration for the settlement.
|
|||||
| Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. McKenzie, No. B138295.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because neither policy defined "owned," the stolen truck was the insured vehicle, and an inter vivos transfer to a dead person did not transfer title; a triable issue of material fact existed as to whether defendant was entitled to coverage.
|
|||||
| Simons v. Steverson, No. B141403.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: California exercised personal jurisdiction over a New York law firm that employed a New York resident, who was an attorney licensed to practice law in California, who performed legal services for California residents in California.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
