 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Griffith v. County of Santa Cruz, No. H019474.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Application of rent control ordinance to landlord's relationship with nine-month recreational vehicle tenants did not run counter to the state ban on commercial rent control.
|
|||||
| In re Jessica K., No. B132583.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal from order denying custody petition was dismissed as moot because failure to file a timely notice of appeal from termination of parental rights order deprived the court of appellate jurisdiction to modify that order.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Terry, No. A083746. No. A083772.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife was not entitled to spousal support where her estate, which had increase in value by more than $ 2 million dollars during the time of the proceedings, was sufficient to meet her proper support needs.
|
|||||
| People v. Palmore, No. D033316.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was properly found guilty of a special allegation of committing rape while in a closed business establishment where the rape occurred while the business was closed, regardless of when appellant entered the business.
|
|||||
| Murray v. Oceanside Unified Sch. Dist., No. D031662.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action arising from alleged workplace discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation, statutes could afford retroactive remedy and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim was potentially viable.
|
|||||
| People v. Storm, D030950,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 19, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When confronted at a police station with an officer's desire to take forensic samples and subject appellant to a polygraph examination, a reasonable person would have concluded that he was in custody for purposes of Miranda.
|
|||||
| People v. Tokash, No. D032125.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was subject to a statutory sentencing enhancement for causing his assault and battery victim to become comatose.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
