 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Guardianship of Ann S., C049915,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights pursuant to Prob. Code, § 1516.5, was proper because § 1516.5 was constitutional and applied retroactively. The mother was presently unfit to properly care for the child and it would have been detrimental to the child not to terminate the mother's parental rights to permit the child's guardians to adopt her.
|
|||||
| Mooney v. Caspari, A108618,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Any malpractice claim that a real estate broker had against defendants, a law firm and its attorneys, based upon defendants' failure to timely file a malpractice action against a bankruptcy lawyer was resolved against the broker by a prior judgment that the bankruptcy lawyer was not liable for malpractice.
|
|||||
| People v. Brown, C048147,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Lopez, B182877,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A prosecutor engaged in prejudicial misconduct that resulted in defendant, a Catholic priest, being denied a fair trial because, in closing argument, she appealed to the jury's passions, prejudices, and sympathy; alluded to facts outside the record; and expressed her personal belief in defendant's guilt.
|
|||||
| People v. Umana, C047790,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported attempted extortion convictions under Pen. Code, §§ 523, 524, where a woman sent a letter to a man with whom she had briefly had sexual relations, demanding money and stating that she had notified the police and prosecutors of rape accusations and that she had consulted with an attorney about bringing civil charges.
|
|||||
| Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., C049013,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a workplace safety enforcement action, substantial evidence supported a finding that an employer was a primary employer for purposes of Lab. Code, § 6401.7, subd. (a), even though an employee was without work and was not receiving an hourly wage from the employer when a lease agreement placing him on a secondary employer's work site was made.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
