|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - March 28, 2008
|
| |
Garza v. Asbestos Corp., LTD., A116523, A119262,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Supplier of raw asbestos was liable for causing a worker's asbestos-related disease; strict liability was applicable to the supplier because incorporating raw asbestos into an insulation product did not substantially alter the asbestos, because strict liability was not restricted to processed products, and because no warnings were provided.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Niles Freeman Equipment v. Joseph, C053200,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Administrative suspension of contractors from participation in state contracts, resulting from improper participation in the California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program, was authorized by Mil. & Vet. Code, ? 999.9, subd. (c)(1), and no conflict existed between former ? 999.9, subd. (d), and Gov. Code, ? 14600.
|
|
| |
People v. Pruitt, B198408,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, March 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's request for presentence custody credit under Pen. Code, ? 2900.5, subd. (b), for time he spent in jail on new charges following his arrest but prior to summary revocation of his probation was properly denied. Defendant was not entitled to credit for presentence custody that was not attributable to conduct that resulted in his sentence.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback