 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Acosta v. Synthetic Industries, Inc., B143381,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, as the manufacturers of a nonversatile, single purpose product used and incorporated in mass-produced homes, was subject to strict products liability to plaintiff homeowners.
|
|||||
| Chambers v. Kay, A091362,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's claim against other attorney for his portion of a contingency fee violated rule prohibiting referral fees without consent of client, but the complaining attorney was entitled to proceed with his claim for quantum meruit.
|
|||||
| Comedy Iii Prods. v. Gary Saderup, No. S076061.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although artist's lithograph and silk-screened T-shirts with picture of "The Three Stooges" were entitled to protection by the First Amendment, company owned rights to comedy team's likeness and right of publicity prevailed.
|
|||||
| Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., B134742,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A successor corporation was entitled to assert a claim for defense and indemnity against the predecessor's insurer because it was seeking nothing more than to enforce a pre-existing obligation by insurers.
|
|||||
| Medical Bd. v. Superior Court, No. C033351.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute requiring disciplinary action against doctor based on similar action in another state did not replace or impliedly repeal more general statute on same subject; therefore court allowed application of the more general law.
|
|||||
| Michael v. Aetna Life & Cas. Ins. Co., No. B131509.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order vacating an appraisal award was reversed. Facts did not require disclosure by party-selected appraiser; thus there was no corruption. Appraiser did not have a substantial business relationship with party.
|
|||||
| People v. Allen, No. C031985.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in ordering burglary defendant to pay a $ 2,000 fine in the form of a penalty assessment, where no underlying fine was imposed against defendant. Other fines imposed were not subject to penalty assessments.
|
|||||
| People v. Dieguez, No. A091657, No. A093253.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's petition for habeas corpus following his conviction for making a false material statement in support of a workers' compensation claim was denied; no ineffective assistance of counsel claim or jurisdictional error warranted reversal.
|
|||||
| People v. Silva, No. S004727.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence of death reversed because the trial court did not make a sincere and reasoned attempt to evaluate the prosecutor's explanation for strikes of minority jurors during the penalty phase of a murder trial.
|
|||||
| People v. O'Casey, No. F034287.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Restitution order was affirmed because trial court properly determined that insurance company was object of appellant's crime of workers' compensation insurance fraud, and thus was direct victim of such crime.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
