 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| County of Orange v. Quinn, No. G028809.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a welfare reimbursement action, trial court erred in dismissing case due to failure to bring action to trial within five years; statute set forth exception to five-year rule for any case in which pendente lite child support order was obtained.
|
|||||
| Forthmann v. Boyer, No. B146996.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Filing formal objection or response was necessary predicate to conducting any discovery with respect to trustees' interim accounting report; absent objection, there was no issue raised to test relevance of proposed discovery.
|
|||||
| Hambarian v. Superior Court, No. S097450.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the district attorney did not need to be disqualified for accepting the assistance of a forensic accountant employed and compensated by the alleged victim, the city, in a fraud investigation.
|
|||||
| People v. Gofman, No. B139753.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly dismissed state counts charging conspiracy and insurance fraud against defendants which were based on the same "acts" to which defendants pled guilty in the federal action.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
