 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mitchell v. Blue Bird Body Co., No. G021708.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State lemon law permitted buyers to recover the entire amount actually expended for new motor vehicle, including paid finance charges. Thus, summary judgment for manufacturer was error as buyers entitled to recover interest.
|
|||||
| People v. McCoy, B127097,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure of trial court to impose suspended fine, required by statute to be in same amount as payable fine, was not waived on appeal by lack of objection because it was clear and correctable independent of facts.
|
|||||
| People v. Otto, A086761,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In commitment hearings under sexual predator statute, admission of witness statements contained in prior conviction records did not violate the hearsay rule, and did not violate right to confront witnesses or due process.
|
|||||
| Reeves v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. C033834.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A worker who had some duties that were custodial in nature was entitled to the benefit of the statutory, rebuttable presumption of industrial causation of heart trouble in his application for workers' compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Eben-King & King, No. A082687.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 25, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's motion to set aside a judgment of marital dissolution was affirmed, because appellant failed to timely file her notice of appeal.
|
|||||
| In re Melvin J., B128478,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Proposition 21, the juvenile court was no longer required to make a series of fact findings to establish that a minor committed a probation violation.
|
|||||
| Thaler v. Household Fin. Corp., No. A088570.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, April 25, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action to quiet title, the court determined that a second trust deed had priority over a later-recorded assessment lien.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
