 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kelton v. Stravinski, F047031,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a covenant not to compete provided that partners would not independently engage in designing or building any warehouse, the covenant was void under Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16600, because it did not fall within the exceptions for covenants related to the sale of the goodwill of a business or the anticipated dissolution of a partnership.
|
|||||
| Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Productions, S125171,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writers' assistant on television show failed to establish a prima facie case of hostile work environment sexual harassment in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq., because most of the sexually coarse and vulgar language at issue did not involve and was not aimed at her or other women in the workplace.
|
|||||
| People v. Munoz, G034265,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Najera, G034988,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Wesson, H028484,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in admitting documentary evidence of a prior offense as propensity evidence under Evid. Code, § 1108; because the prior offense of forcible oral copulation was of the same class and nature as the charged offenses of forcible sexual penetration and sodomy, it was relevant, and § 1108 did not limit evidence to live testimony.
|
|||||
| State Bd. of Equalization v. Superior Court, H028833,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying transfer of a sales and use tax refund action under Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6933, which was brought in a county where a branch office of the California Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement was located; that office had no legal staff, and § 6933 provided for venue only where the California Attorney General had a legal staff.
|
|||||
| Thornburg v. Superior Court, D045247,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
