 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Garden Grove Police Dep't v. Superior Court, No. G027730.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant seeking discovery of the birth dates of three police officers was required to comply with the Pitchess process; the requested information was subject to in camera review by the court to determine its relevance.
|
|||||
| Olszewski v. ScrippsHealth, D034197,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Health care provider's lien on patient's claim against third party pursuant to health care lien statute was invalid, as statute was preempted by federal law, but patient's unfair competition and tort claims against provider were barred.
|
|||||
| People v. Adair, B138462,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to establish that there was no reasonable cause to believe she committed the offense for which she was arrested; thus, granting her petition for a finding of factual innocence was improper.
|
|||||
| People v. Englebrecht, No. D033527.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injunction prohibiting appellant and others from associating with a gang in a defined area did not impermissibly burden appellant's associational rights, and was narrowly tailored to legitimate purpose of abating a public nuisance.
|
|||||
| People v. Silfa, No. B139818.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was mentally competent and fully informed of his right to counsel. He was literate and understood the dangers of self-representation. Nothing more was required of him to exercise his right of self-representation.
|
|||||
| Schwartz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., No. B140274.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Excess insurer failed to meet its summary judgment burden of showing that it complied with its duty to consider insureds' interest in limited policy proceeds, despite fact interest had not matured so as to require payment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
