Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - April 10, 2008

  
300 DeHaro St. Investors v. Department of Hous. & Community Development, C053033, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Landlord could maintain a complaint alleging that it was a breach of contract to deny a request to increase rents in an apartment building that participated in a low-income housing program; a writ of administrative mandamus under Code Civ. Proc., ? 1094.5, was not the proper procedure because no administrative hearing was required by law.

Search Cases for Free

  
Block v. Orange County Employees Retirement System, G038123, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where employee retired concurrently from county employees' retirement system and public retirement system, under Gov. Code, ? 31838.5, employee's service-connected disability retirement benefits were reduced pro rata so that total retirement benefit would not be greater than what he would have received had employment been with just one entity.

Search Cases for Free

  
Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., D045154, D045579, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors, H030986, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although a mandamus petition challenging approval of the relocation of a trail was filed more than 30 days after the notice of determination, leave to amend had to be granted on demurrer because a failure to determine significant effects could possibly be alleged under Pub. Resources Code, ? 21167, subd. (a), which had a 180-day limitation period.

Search Cases for Free

  
Erika K. v. Brett D., A116590, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Order awarding custody of mother's child to nonparent custodian was reversed, where family court prematurely concluded that ICWA was unconstitutional before applying its substantive provisions. Family court should not have proceeded to consider the constitutional question unless it had first concluded that a constitutional issue actually existed.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Gomez, S140612, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Sufficient evidence satisfied the immediate presence element of robbery under Pen. Code, ? 211, even though the victim did not confront defendant inside the victim's restaurant, because, as defendant walked away with money in a backpack, the victim followed in a truck, and defendant fired two shots at the victim from a distance of 100 to 150 feet.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Tolliver, C049959, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top