 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 99 Cents Only Stores v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. B133156.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given record lacking qualifications, supervision, or explanation of reasonableness, attorney's fees of $ 163 an hour for unlicensed hearing representative at deposition for workers' compensation case were patently excessive.
|
|||||
| Cornette v. Department of Transportation, B125741,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for state transportation agency in personal injury suit was reversed. Plaintiffs were entitled to a jury trial on elements of agency's design immunity defense, except for the element of reasonableness of the design.
|
|||||
| Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo, D030802,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Guilty plea did not collaterally estop plaintiff from proving actual innocence in criminal malpractice action because statute of limitations created impediment to requiring setting aside conviction as element of tort.
|
|||||
| Craik v. County of Santa Cruz, No. H020690.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant clearly articulated its reasons for granting real parties' requested variances and the court had no trouble following defendant's analysis; therefore, granting the variances was proper.
|
|||||
| Waters v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. B133972.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A penalty was reinstated because the evidence did not support the conclusion that the delay of payment of disability benefits was either brief, inadvertent, resulting from simple clerical human error or expected in the normal course of business.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
