 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Huskinson & Brown v. Wolf, B147298,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a lawyer referral agency's suit to recovery fees from a law firm, the trial court erred in awarding damages under quantum meruit, as client did not consent in writing.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Read, B151293,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce client's former attorney's petition for rehearing was denied, though opinion was modified in certain particulars. Issue in case which attorney cited was not the propriety of proceeding with Borson motion over client's opposition.
|
|||||
| Kasky v. Nike, Inc., No. S087859.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 2, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where corporation's messages made representations of fact about its operations for purpose of promoting sales of its products, they were commercial speech for purposes of applying state laws barring false and misleading commercial messages.
|
|||||
| People v. Jaspar, No. F035439.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 2, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a second degree murder case, jury instruction did not limit the application of battered women's syndrome evidence to perfect self-defense, and jury instructions did not confuse jury.
|
|||||
| People v. Superior Court (henkel), No. A096715.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 2, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Offender was not eligible for probation under the California Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000, where he had a prior strike and seven months before committing a drug possession offense was convicted of committing another felony.
|
|||||
| Buckner v. Tamarin, No. B149385.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied physician's petition to compel arbitration of survivors' wrongful death claim against him; decedent, who entered into arbitration agreement, had no authority to waive survivors' right to a jury trial of their claims.
|
|||||
| Westerfield v. Superior Court, D039640,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court of appeals ordered the sealing of documents related to search warrants in a criminal trial where defendant was tried for heinous crimes in connection with the murder of child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
