|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
California - April 12, 2007
|
| |
Air Couriers Internat. v. Employment Development Dept., C050978,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Package delivery drivers were employees as defined in Unemp. Ins. Code, § 621, subd. (b), because the company retained control over the delivery operation and because the drivers worked a regular schedule, often had regular routes, infrequently turned down jobs, had no independent business, and made no major investments in equipment or materials.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Frank v. County of Los Angeles, B169427 and B172347,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Evidence was insufficient to support special verdicts finding racial discrimination under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Gov. Code, § 12940 et seq.; although a higher-paid classification consisted mainly of non-minority employees, no discriminatory barriers deterred minorities from applying, and racial animus was not shown.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|