 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of University of California, G037749,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 23, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which plaintiffs, who received fertility treatments at a clinic in the late 1980s, sued university regents and a medical center, alleging that clinic doctors stole human genetic material from them, statute of limitations was triggered on date plaintiffs received letters stating their names were on a list that had been secretly kept.
|
|||||
| Wagner v. Wagner, B197703,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, April 23, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent's daughter, as trustee of decedent's living trust, was prohibited from allowing her own claim as creditor under Prob. Code, ¿ 19253, subd. (a), where she lacked necessary documentation. Her claim for compensation was not timely under Prob. Code, ¿ 19000 et seq., which governed administration of claims against a decedent's revocable trust.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
