 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alford v. Superior Court, D036869,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon defendant's request for disclosure of citizen complainants' names, addresses, and telephone numbers contained in police officer personnel records, the superior court was directed to release the information after finding good cause shown.
|
|||||
| Cochran v. Cochran, No. B138551.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a breach of contract action arising out of a long-term, nonmarital relationship, the court reversed summary judgment; adults who lived together were as competent as any other persons to contract respecting their earnings and property rights.
|
|||||
| Fox Searchlight Pictures v. Paladino, No. B142129, No. B143537.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, May 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An in-house counsel could disclose ostensible employer-client confidences to her own attorneys to the extent they might be relevant to the preparation of her wrongful termination action against her former client-employer.
|
|||||
| Gangwish v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. B145394.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Firefighter was statutorily entitled to increased compensation for late payment of permanent disability benefits, even though temporary disability had not been paid to him.
|
|||||
| People v. Medina, No. C036049.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court's discretionary power to reinstate probation was not lost where probation was originally granted after imposition of sentence. On violation and revocation of probation, court retained discretion to reinstate probation.
|
|||||
| Bahl v. Bank of Am., No. G022816.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying plaintiff's requests for a continuance, as plaintiff submitted sufficient affidavits in connection with both her initial request for a continuance and her subsequent requests.
|
|||||
| In re Dani R., No. G027802.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dependency proceeding, parents' appeal from a judgment declaring their son a dependent of the court was moot; the court had already granted mother's request for reunification services and father had waived his right to appeal.
|
|||||
| People v. Walker, No. D035890.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in imposing on State the burden to prove, as an element of the "truth of a prior conviction," the validity of an underlying change of plea; defendant was required to show that prior conviction by plea was unconstitutional.
|
|||||
| Roger E. Smith v. Shn Consulting Eng'rs & Geologists, No. A088522.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Four-year statute of limitations inapplicable to contractor's suit against architect and construction manager for patent defects that no longer existed upon substantial completion; however, professional negligence statute of limitations did apply.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
