|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - May 15, 2009
|
| |
Conservatorship of Amanda B., D053732,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 15, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although substantial evidence supported the trial court's order denying a conservatee's request for modification, the trial court should have considered on the merits the conservatee's petition under Welf. & Inst. Code, ? 5364, for rehearing on her status as a conservatee.
|
|
| |
First National Ins. Co. v. Cam Painting, Inc., B200830,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 15, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Surety that bonded both a subcontractor and the general contractor could not attribute any of the loss from the subcontractor's failure to pay a supplier to the general contractor's bond because the general contractor, as obligee on the subcontractor's bond under Civ. Code, ? 2787, was entitled to have the surety pay the supplier's claim.
|
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Ranscht, D052811,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 15, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mandatory sex offender registration under Pen. Code, ? 290, subd. (c), for sexually penetrating a minor violated the Equal Protection Clause because a similarly situated offender convicted of unlawful sexual intercourse with a victim the same age would not have faced mandatory lifetime registration.
|
|
| |
People v. Valladares, G039799,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 15, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The evidence supported a finding that defendant intended to manufacture, distribute, and sell false immigration documents, in violation of Pen. Code, ? 113, because, among other things, he was present at a location of a suspected counterfeit operation, knew about government issued documents, and was willing to falsify a Social Security number.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback