 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Griset v. Fair Political Practices Com, No. S077219.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intermediate appellate court lacked authority to entertain plaintiffs' second appeal in the same action. Once state supreme court's earlier decision became final, it terminated litigation as to all causes of action in plaintiffs' complaint.
|
|||||
| In re Marcus T., No. B146114.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's threat against the public officer was a lesser and necessarily included crime of the terrorist threat; thus, he committed one, not two felonies, and remand for further proceedings was necessary.
|
|||||
| In re William G., No. C036345.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court's order terminating father's parental rights was proper because efforts of California Department of Health and Human Services to notify and involve father in proceedings satisfied requirements of Indian Child Welfare Act.
|
|||||
| People v. Eccleston, No. A090567.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence admitted in accordance with statutory procedure concerning admission of child's statement of sexual abuse as recounted by others did not violate the accused's right to confront the witness.
|
|||||
| People v. Superior Court (Laff), No. S063662.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When materials were seized from two attorneys pursuant to a search warrant during a criminal investigation, the superior court had an obligation to determine claims of attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
| Solin v. O'Melveny & Myers, No. B140076.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly dismissed attorney's suit against another law firm for professional malpractice; attorney's discussions with law firm included information about his own clients, who had the right to assert the attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
