 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Tobacco II Cases, S147345,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a class action against tobacco companies under California's unfair competition law, Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq., in accordance with Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17203, and Code Civ. Proc., § 382, the standing requirements of Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17204, were applicable only to the class representatives and not all absent class members.
|
|||||
| People v. Castellanos, B210705,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In setting the amount of the crime prevention programs fine imposed pursuant to Pen. Code, § 1202.5, subd. (a), the trial court had to take into account defendant's ability to pay, the amount of any other fine imposed on defendant, and the amount of any restitution ordered paid to defendant's victims.
|
|||||
| People v. Curl, S034072,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a capital murder case, the record did not support defendant's claim that an inmate who testified that defendant told him he committed a murder perjured himself when he testified that he had not received any benefits in exchange for his testimony, much less that the prosecutor suborned perjury.
|
|||||
| Riverside Sheriffs' Assn. v. County of Riverside, E045792,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in denying a terminated county employee's cause of action seeking relief under the California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act based on the finding that the employee's dismissal from her position as a peace officer was not punitive. The employee's termination was per se punitive.
|
|||||
| In re G.W., F056246,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court erred in ignoring the requirements of Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361.4, when it appointed a stepgrandmother the legal guardian of five of her six grandchildren. The stepgrandmother had a criminal record, and her request for an exemption had been denied.
|
|||||
| People v. Mena, D052091,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even assuming that a trial court erred by denying defendant's motion for a pretrial lineup, defendant was not entitled to reversal of his conviction because requirement of timely pursuit of a lineup included timely review of an adverse ruling by writ proceedings, and failure to pursue writ relief waived the claim of error.
|
|||||
| V. C. v. Superior Court, C059050,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court abused its discretion in dismissing pursuant to Welf. & Inst. Code, § 782, minor's most recently sustained petition in order to make him eligible for a Department of Corrections juvenile facilities commitment pursuant to Welf. & Inst. Code, § 733, subd. (c). Minor had a due process right to the benefit of his plea bargain.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
