 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Malibu v. Santa Monica Mts. Conservancy, No. B151606.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, May 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In city's suit for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, trial court erred in entering a declaratory judgment that conservancy, a state agency, was not subject to the city's land use regulations under California statutory law.
|
|||||
| Eastburn v. Regional Fire Protection Authority, E029463,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As fire protection agencies owed no special duty to plaintiffs and had statutory qualified immunity, lawsuit based on agencies' alleged negligence in failing to promptly dispatch an ambulance was properly dismissed on defendants' demurrers.
|
|||||
| Jonathan Neil & Associates, Inc. v. Jones, F029400 & F030300,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insurer's request for an additional premium from an insured based on additional risks did not constitute bad faith breach of an insurance contract; insurer's failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
|
|||||
| People v. Archer, No. C038718.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported indecent exposure conviction where act of exposing penis in anger during incident of "road rage," accompanied by suggestive comment, could reasonably be characterized as act undertaken for purpose of sexual affront.
|
|||||
| People v. Martin, No. E028833.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's Sixth Amendment rights were not violated by police, who used secretly record conversations between defendant and his girlfriend; there was no agreement between police and defendant's girlfriend to obtain evidence against defendant.
|
|||||
| Saratoga Fire Prot. Dist. v. Hackett, H022553,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
