 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Pomona v. Superior Court, No. B148045.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for writ of mandate was issued commanding the superior court to set aside its order dismissing the city's cause of action alleging a violation of the false claims act.
|
|||||
| Cmty. Redevelopment Agency v. County of L.A., No. B136115.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where agency alleged county's method of calculating how property tax revenue was shared was improper and resulted in underpayment of revenue, dismissal of claim was valid, since method did not conflict with statute's process.
|
|||||
| Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, B142962,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment on employee's disability discrimination claim against employer. Amendments to Fair Employment and Housing Act did not apply retroactively to employee's case.
|
|||||
| Conservatorship of Margaret L., No. G026908.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following a unanimous jury verdict finding appellant gravely disabled, the appellate court's independent review yielded no appellate issues to justify reversal of the trial court's decision to extend her existing conservatorship.
|
|||||
| Cooley v. Superior Court, No. B148019.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly ordered probable cause hearing on district attorney's petition to civilly recommit sexually violent predator. District attorney's petition for writ of mandate directing trial court not to hold hearing was denied.
|
|||||
| First Commercial Mortgage Co. v. Reece, No. B137132.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a breach of contract action arising out of a loan, a full credit bid did not preclude a claim by the lender repurchasing foreclosure property that it suffered damages from the compelled repurchase as a consequence of a misrepresentation.
|
|||||
| In re Alva, B142625,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite punitive aspects connected to sex offender registration, they did not change the requirement into punishment under an Eighth Amendment analysis, and the requirement could be imposed for possession of child pornography.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Duffy, No. B136160.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A spouse generally was not bound by the prudent investor rule and did not owe to the other spouse the duty of care one business partner owed to another.
|
|||||
| McClellan v. Northridge Park Townhome Owners Ass'n, No. B139452.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly amended judgment to add new condominium owners' association as additional judgment debtor; new entity was essentially nothing more than the continuation of the original defendant under a different name.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
