 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Chavez, B139931,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction by a jury of murder during the commission of a home invasion robbery was affirmed; no evidence of duress or battered woman's syndrome could have in any way excused or minimized appellant's intent.
|
|||||
| People v. Cuevas, No. A091903.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Element of "force or fear" was easily inferred although bank teller did not specifically state that she was afraid, appellant was not deprived of right to jury nullification, and consecutive sentences for bank robberies was proper.
|
|||||
| People v. Garcia, No. S081934.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the jury instruction on the actual knowledge requirement was potentially misleading, the error was harmless as strong evidence was presented that defendant knew of the sex offender registration requirements.
|
|||||
| People v. Rodriguez, B142586,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by failing to define the phrase "recurring access" contained in continuous sexual abuse of a child statute because that phase did not have a technical meaning. Restitution order was reduced.
|
|||||
| Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400, No. S085736.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment affirmed in favor of landlords; plaintiff did not show that apartment owners' failure to provide increased security, despite the foreseeability of assaults, actually caused her injuries.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
