|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - April 30, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
Blickman Turkus, LP v. MF Downtown Sunnyvale, LLC, H029980,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 30, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Lessor failed to show lessee's realtor was liable for wrongfully failing to disclose information because realtor did not have a duty to inform the lessor, after the commercial lease was signed but before the lessee took possession, that the lessee's ability to perform conditions of the lease was jeopardized by its deteriorating financial condition.
|
|
| |
|
| |
EnPalm, LLC v. The Teitler Family Trust, etc., B194372,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, April 30, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a real estate dispute, the trial court did not err in applying equitable principles to reduce an award of contractual attorney fees under Civ. Code, ? 1717, because one of the sellers lied under oath about material matters, which made much of the litigation unnecessary and the lodestar fees unreasonable; the fee reduction was not a punishment.
|
|
| |
Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, LLP v. Koch, D049788,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 30, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: It was not necessary that an arbitration award be vacated pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., ? 1286.2, on the ground arbitrator refused to disqualify himself after receiving timely notice of disqualification when notice was based on disclosure of information arbitrator was not required to disclose but nonetheless revealed out of an abundance of caution.
|
|
| |
Mendez v. Superior Court, D051512,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 30, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a case involving domestic violence charges, there was no error under Pen. Code, ? 1050, subd. (g)(2), in granting a 10-day continuance, even if it was anticipated that the prosecutor would be available before the expiration of that period, because a police officer's absence also presented a valid reason for granting the maximum time allowable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Kelly, E042607,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, April 30, 2008, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: On remand of a criminal case for a Wheeler/Batson hearing, there was no error in the trial court's determining that the prosecutor's peremptory challenges had been proper, despite lack of participation by defendant's trial counsel, because the trial court made the requisite finding of demeanor and credibility, based on its own recollection of both.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback