 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Conservatorship of Christopher A., D047022,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Donner Management Co. v. Schaffer, D046439,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although shareholders voluntarily posted security under Corp. Code, § 800, for attorney fees in a derivative lawsuit and obtained dismissal without prejudice after a special litigation committee defense was established, a director was entitled to attorney fees because the defense supported an implied finding of no reasonable possibility of benefit.
|
|||||
| IN THE MATTER OF ALLENE DOWNEY NICHOLSON A MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, S143387,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 17, 2006, Decided , May 17, 2006
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Francisco W., D047094,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a parental rights termination case in which a social services agency failed to send sufficient notice as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act, a limited reversal and remand in which the juvenile court was instructed to correct the notice defect and reinstate the judgment of termination if no tribe chose to intervene was appropriate remedy.
|
|||||
| Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of Capitola, H027860,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an inverse condemnation action challenging a city's rent control ordinance, the trial court erred in finding that the ordinance as applied was reasonably related to and substantially advanced its stated purposes; the "substantially advances" test was not appropriate for regulatory takings cases under Fifth Amendment case law.
|
|||||
| Paulus v. Bob Lynch Ford, Inc., H028629,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because individual did not make prima facie showing that competitor's prior suit attempting to block his business development lacked probable cause, which was essential element of malicious prosecution claim, trial court properly granted competitor's special motion to strike individual's malicious prosecution claim under Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
