Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - California - August 8, 2000
	City of Santa Cruz v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., No. H019427., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, August 8, 2000, Decided View this case - free   Overview: As to 14 of 70 plaintiff cities, factual issue existed about whether defendant electric utility had a constitutional franchise entitling it to pay a lower "complementary" fee and rebut contentions it had underpaid non-lighting franchise fees. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Marriage of Dancy, No. E021923., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, August 8, 2000, Decided View this case - free   Overview: A child support order 28 years old was not barred from enforcement by the doctrine of laches, where the father stipulated that he had the ability to pay child support arrearages, and was thus not prejudiced by the delay. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Mitchell, B123823, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, August 8, 2000, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco, A083530, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, August 8, 2000, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Pleadings filed by hotel owners alleged sufficient facts to state a claim that monetary exaction under the Hotel Conversion Ordinance of San Francisco, California, resulted in an unconstitutional taking. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.