 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alpert v. Villa Romano Homeowners Ass'n, No. B118182.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting property owner's motion for nonsuit on plaintiff's claim relating to her injuries arising from a fall caused by an upturned sidewalk. Plaintiff's evidence was sufficient to overcome the motion.
|
|||||
| Duggal v. G.E. Capital Communications Servs., No. B125295, No. B129637.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The filed rate doctrine barred appellants' action for negligence, and the action for an accounting failed because it was derived from and depended on the validity of the action for negligence.
|
|||||
| Goffney v. Family S&L Ass'n, B119732,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owner's action to set aside a foreclosure sale, unaccompanied by an offer to redeem, failed to state a cause of action which a court of equity could recognize.
|
|||||
| Hunt v. Superior Court, No. D034797.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The contact with California was insufficient to permit personal jurisdiction, and the forum selection clause did not give petitioners sufficient notice that they were agreeing to litigate disputes in California.
|
|||||
| In re Mitchell, No. D035151.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Limitation of custody credits for commission of violent felonies did not apply to prisoner's sentencing because conspiracy to commit crimes set forth in statute was not among the violent felonies defined in the statute.
|
|||||
| People v. Oldham, No. D031986.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father had authority to grant search of defendant son's room. Whether police had good faith belief father had authority to consent to search of closed containers in bedroom could not be raised for first time on appeal.
|
|||||
| Pierotti v. Torian, No. A086713.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under parties' agreement, arbitrator had authority to award attorney fees. Sanctions were proper because defendant's attorneys' appeal egregiously violated court rules, was frivolous, and, was taken solely to delay.
|
|||||
| Rakestraw v. Cal. Physicians' Serv., No. B115766.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The prohibition against charging a copayment because of sex did not include charging a copayment because of pregnancy.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
