 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ford v. Norton, No. F032740.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Only psychiatrist, not psychologist, had authority to order early discharge of mental patient. Trial court erred in holding that psychologist, who released patient before 72-hour treatment period ended, was exempt from civil liability.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Tech. Sys. v. Commerical Contractors, No. B141537.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subcontractor's attempt to enforce a bond against the surety pursuant to the summary remedy was properly denied because the issuance of the bond preceded the filing of the lawsuit, and the surety was not joined as a party.
|
|||||
| People v. Valdez, No. B143513.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant was convicted of sexual battery for molesting his five-year-old niece, and exhibited signs of mental illness, it was not error for him to be involuntarily committed for psychiatric care while serving his time.
|
|||||
| Pinkerton, Inc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. B143940.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A notice changing the primary treating physician (PTP) in a workers' compensation case had to state that it was changing the PTP, specify a recipient, and be sent to the employee in order to comply with the labor code and the regulations.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
