 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Oceanside v. Superior Court, No. D034606.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A lifeguard's personal injury suit against the City of Oceanside, California, was barred by the firefighter's rule.
|
|||||
| In re James Q., No. C032964.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dependency proceeding, a mother was entitled to a hearing before the juvenile court terminated her reunification services.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Hall, No. G023735.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's child support modification order was reversed, where trial court did not comply with statutory requirement for a statement of reasons for differing from child support guidelines formula amount.
|
|||||
| Md. Casualty Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. D032972, No. D033116.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit for allocation of defense costs among insurers, the trial court erred in shifting entire defense burden to appellant insurer under equitable subrogation principles because the equitable contribution doctrine applied.
|
|||||
| Mendoza v. Club Car, No. D031575.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a products liability trial, no jury misconduct occurred as a result of the length of time the jury deliberated. The trial court correctly exercised its discretion in determining the verdict was inconsistent.
|
|||||
| People v. Wakefield, No. D032530.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sexually violent predator commitment petitions were properly granted where first petition was filed when defendant was in good faith custody, albeit under a mistake of law, and second petition was based on five-month-old evaluation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
