 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co., No. S086738.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petroleum companies carried their burden of persuasion to show that there was no triable issue of material fact and that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to retail consumer's Cartwright Act and unfair competition law claims.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. Lockyer v. Fremont General Corp., No. B136677.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The People were not exempt from statutes providing that rejection of a settlement offer, followed by judgment in favor of the offeror, resulted in the offeror's entitlement to costs and expert witness fees incurred in defense.
|
|||||
| People v. Ansell, No. S079744.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendment limiting the circumstances under which a "certificate of rehabilitation" could be obtained by sex offenders did not completely foreclose offenders from seeking a pardon and did not otherwise implicate ex post facto concerns.
|
|||||
| People v. Salas, No. B141709.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant was never found to have personally used a firearm in the commission of the attempted murder, imposition of the 15-year minimum parole eligibility date enhancement for gang activity was improper.
|
|||||
| People v. Tafoya, E029271,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's obstructing telephone line conviction upheld because: (1) there was sufficient evidence to support conviction for disabling private phone; and (2) court's jury instruction was correct, responsive, and directly applicable to evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
