LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - June 8, 2009

  
Bonander v. Town of Tiburon, S151370, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Property owners contesting individual assessments made by a town under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Sts. & Hy. Code, § 10000 et seq., did not have to comply with the newspaper publication requirement of Code Civ. Proc., § 863, because the action was governed solely by Sts. & Hy. Code, § 10400, and not Sts. & Hy. Code, § 10601.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cory v. Toscano, F055231, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A trust beneficiary's proposed petition was not a contest under Prob. Code, § 21305, subd. (a)(3), where it alleged that handwritten notations on the trust instrument, which were made after the trust was executed, were an attempt to amend the trust and were invalid because the "amendment" was not part of the original trust agreement.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property & Business Improvement Dist., B183545, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc., G039922, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a case in which a car buyer alleged that an automobile manufacturer violated California's Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, and the buyer prevailed at trial, the trial court had jurisdiction to award prejudgment interest to the buyer pursuant to Civ. Code, § 3287.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc., G038734 (Consol. with G039274 & G039624), COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court abused its discretion by not imposing a terminating sanction pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2025.450, subd. (d), 2023.030, for a manufacturer's persistent and flagrant discovery misconduct under Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subds. (d)-(g), when more discovery abuses came to light during the trial of a consumer warranty and fraud case.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Aldana, G040320, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence was insufficient to convict a county hospital administrator under Pen. Code, § 424, subd. (a)(3), for keeping false accounts, even though she prepared inaccurate timesheets for an employee, because the employee worked many more hours for county than were listed. Thus, the evidence was insufficient as to administrator's guilty knowledge.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Zaragoza v. Ibarra, G040242, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 8, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a case in which plaintiff, a worker hired by unlicensed contractor on a home remodeling project, was injured while working on the job, plaintiff could bring a claim against homeowner in simple negligence, if there was any. However, plaintiff's injury was entirely his fault. Hence, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of homeowner.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.