LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - May 31, 2002

  
Baker v. Gourley, No. G028732., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The driver's license revocation statute required a valid chemical test of .08 percent or above to suspend a driver's driving privilege; circumstantial evidence without the test was insufficient to prove the blood alcohol content.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Basura v. U. S. Home Corp., No. B151131., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where buyers sued builder for home design and construction defects, and court denied builder's petition to compel arbitration, state statute was preempted by FAA, and thus buyers could not invoke statute to avoid arbitration agreements.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Crawford v. Huntington Beach Union High Sch. Dist., No. G028752., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: California Proposition 209, which applied to public education, forbade a school district's open transfer policy which had a racial and ethnic balance component.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hackett v. John Crane, No. A092213, No. A093411., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: When calculating a non-settling asbestos manufacturer's credit for settlement amounts an employee received from other defendants, ratio of economic to non-economic damages found by jury had to be applied to settlement proceeds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lopez v. C.G.M. Development, Inc., No. B150621., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2002, Decided , May 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Just because an employee was entitled to sue his employer for damages because the employer was not properly insured, this did not authorize the employee to sue the property owner, who was not to be held responsible for the employer's wrongdoing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
O'Connor Agency, Inc. v. Brodkin, G026504, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An advertising agency had a viable suit against an attorney for negligently failing to recover punitive damages in a lawsuit he brought on the agency's behalf.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ortiz v. L.A. Police Relief Ass'n, No. B148574., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A discharged employee had no action for wrongful termination; she had a conflict of interest due to an intimate relationship with an inmate and access to confidential information about law enforcement personnel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, G025980, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where supplemental declaration submitted by landlord and trustee in reply to assignee's answer to summary judgment motion was not in a separate statement, it was not admissible, and trial court erred in considering the evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.