 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Jamie R., No. B144451.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In camera interview with children was proper in the absence of mother's counsel where mother, by not objecting at in-court stipulation, waived her right to have counsel present, and her due process rights were not prejudiced.
|
|||||
| People v. Foote, No. BR40928,
APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, June 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's solicitation of money for incense had no religious connotations whatsoever; therefore, his conviction for violating an ordinance prohibiting him from vending without a permit did not raise First Amendment concerns.
|
|||||
| People v. Quintana, No. A090166.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Foreign object penetration of a minor conviction was affirmed. Sexual penetration referred to penetration of the labia majora, rather than penetration of the vagina.
|
|||||
| City of San Diego v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. D036744.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer's commute to courthouse was not a special mission but instead was within the purview of the going and coming rule; thus he was not entitled to receive workers' compensation benefits for injuries suffered during the commute.
|
|||||
| Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior Court, No. B145406, No. B145399,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 20, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| L.A. Unified Sch. Dist. v. Wilshire Ctr. Marketplace, No. B129628.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: School district was entitled to recover the amount it deposited as the probable amount of compensation after abandoning its condemnation action, and calculation of property owner's litigation costs did not defer entry of final judgment.
|
|||||
| People v. Byrd, No. C036033.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant had at least two prior strikes, and minimum term for each indeterminate life term was properly calculated. Sentence was neither cruel nor unusual, even though he could not serve the sentence during his lifetime.
|
|||||
| Serv. Employees Internat. Union v. Superior Court, No. D037381.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where superior court rejected request for decertification elections since unions did not meet 50 percent signature requirement, that requirement was found unreasonable, and court was ordered to adopt reasonable requirements.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
