 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Am. Online v. Superior Court, No. A092813.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A forum selection clause was unenforceable because it violated California public policy. Rights of consumer class members would have been substantially diminished if they were required to litigate dispute in Virginia.
|
|||||
| Estate of Griswold, No. S087881.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite lack of contact between father and decedent, where father admitted and paid support, father acknowledged decedent within the meaning of the intestacy statutes, and prior paternity proceeding precluded relitigation of the issue.
|
|||||
| Guardians of Elk Creek Old Growth v. Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot., No. A088611.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition challenging approval of a timber harvest plan was dismissed for petitioner's failure to comply with a provision of the California Environmental Quality Act requiring petitioner to request a hearing within 90 days of filing the petition.
|
|||||
| Neal v. Superior Court, No. G028185.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The family law court had jurisdiction over a civil action which was really nothing more than reruns of a family law case.
|
|||||
| People v. Cheek, No. S083305.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant at a show cause hearing for annual review of sexually violent predator status has a right to present oral testimony, including expert testimony, and to cross-examine the authors of adverse medical reports.
|
|||||
| People v. Cunningham, No. S010856.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the trial court properly conducted voir dire of a capital punishment jury prior to the penalty phase of the trial, there was no error, and the remainder of alleged error meritless, conviction and sentence of death affirmed.
|
|||||
| People v. Zangari, No. A091689.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported trial court's conclusion that defendant's prior Oregon burglary conviction was properly alleged and proven as a strike under California's Three Strikes Law.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
