|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
California - June 5, 2002
|
| |
Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & Assocs., No. D037229.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insurer's employing counsel to represent insureds was not unauthorized law practice as, absent conflict of interest requiring independent counsel, attorney represented insured and insurer, but insurer did not show absence of conflict of interest.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Ranger Ins. Co., No. B150125.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 5, 2002, Decided , June 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a bail matter, the trial court erred in determining that bail was forfeited upon defendant's failure to appear as a matter of law without considering the bond surety's request for an extension.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Watts v. Farmers Ins. Exch., No. B149606.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an insurance matter involving fraud, an innocent co-insured, who held property jointly with an insured who committed fraud, was not automatically excluded from coverage.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|