LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - May 8 - May 9, 2007

  
Baxter v. Peterson, B188676, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a case in which tenant sued landlord for fraud, trial court committed prejudicial error in instructing jury on both liability and damages issues. However, reversal on the liability issue did not require a retrial of landlord's statute of limitations defense, as the erroneous instruction with regard to liability had no effect on that defense.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist., C050715, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Miller v. Filter, C051696, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because employees of a district attorneys association who prosecuted a criminal action against a mine were de facto deputy district attorneys engaged in activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16, they were entitled to absolute immunity for their actions in that prosecution under Gov. Code, § 821.6.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
AB Cellular LA, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, B185373, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: City's increased cell phone service tax violated requirement in Proposition 218 that proposed tax increase be submitted to voters for approval because city had revised methodology under Gov. Code, § 53750, by which it calculated tax when it decided to implement Mobile Telecommunications Sourcing Act and unilaterally expand tax to cover all airtime.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Del Junco v. Hufnagel, B191456, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a defamation case, statements made by defendant in her counterfeit website damaged plaintiff's reputation and were actionable under Civ. Code, § 46(3), where defendant falsely stated that plaintiff, a vascular surgeon, was not a licensed physician and did not have the educational background to perform the procedures he promoted.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Reyes, B185929, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court's imposition of upper term sentences did not violate the Sixth Amendment because defendant admitted multiple prior convictions on the stand, which was sufficient to support the imposition of an upper term under Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (b), making the upper term the statutory maximum for his offenses.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Ybarra, F047855, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sea Foods Co., Ltd. v. O.M. Foods Co., Ltd., B184687, B190151, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Importer did not refuse to comply with a writ of attachment in bad faith, within the meaning of Code Civ. Proc., § 708.180, because it signed bills of exchange payable to two banks when it received shipments of shrimp and thus had good reason to believe that the banks, and not the insolvent shrimp exporter's judgment creditor, owned the funds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.