 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ardon v. City of Los Angeles, B201035,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 16, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Palacio Del Mar Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. McMahon, G040349, G040412,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 16, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A postjudgment order directing a judgment debtor to turn over a domain name to a judgment creditor to aid the execution of its money judgment against the judgment debtor was subject to reversal because Code Civ. Proc., ¿ 708.205, did not allow a turnover of intangible property directly to the judgment creditor.
|
|||||
| Paterson v. City of Los Angeles, B208682,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 16, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city's investigation of suspected sick leave abuse led to punitive action against two police officers within the meaning of Gov. Code, ¿ 3303, where the investigation resulted in the officers' temporary suspensions, and there was no merit to the city's assertion that any punitive action had been nullified by the officers' subsequent exoneration.
|
|||||
| People v. Cortes, B206770,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 16, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence including a detective's testimony that rival gang members shot each other on sight and that defendant's gang was involved in criminal street activity ranging from vandalism to narcotics sales, robberies, murders, attempted murders, and rapes was sufficient to prove that acts in Pen. Code, ¿ 186.22, subd. (e), were primary gang activities.
|
|||||
| People v. Dillon, A117853A119292,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 16, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taken together, CALCRIM Nos. 890, 1045, adequately instructed that a Pen. Code, ¿ 220, conviction for the lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit forcible sexual penetration required a finding of lack of consent. Absent evidence of equivocal conduct, the prosecution did not have the burden to disprove reasonable belief in consent.
|
|||||
| People v. Mirenda, D053261,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 16, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to dismissal of attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon charges because a preaccusation delay of 25 years violated his federal due process rights and state constitutional speedy trial rights; although he was arrested in another state not long after the shooting, the prosecution declined to return him to California.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
