 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Pedro M., No. B130400.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The psychotherapist's testimony was admissible, the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that appellant had violated the terms of probation, and commitment to the California Youth Authority was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Kajima/Ray Wilson v. L.A. County Metro., No. S077461.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A subcontractor wrongfully denied a public contract, could not maintain an action for lost profits against the public entity who rejected subcontractor's bid.
|
|||||
| Luque v. Herrera, No. B133525.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's attorney was entitled to fees out of settlement fund where employee's attorney's efforts resulted in creation of the fund, despite the fact that employers' reimbursement claim exceeded the entire amount of settlement fund.
|
|||||
| People v. Rubalcava, No. S081209.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court concluded that statutory language was unambiguous and established that defendant did not have to intend to use concealed instrument as stabbing weapon in order to be convicted of carrying concealed dirk or dagger.
|
|||||
| People v. Smith, No. A087299.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order of reimbursement of attorney fees by criminal defendant was proper where defendant was given notice sufficient to alert him to the possibility of repayment, and statute authorized collection from monies already seized.
|
|||||
| Rose v. Superior Court, No. B134032.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon receipt of an order to show cause from appellate court concerning a habeas petition, the court was required to either release petitioner or hold an evidentiary hearing; denial of petition in minute order was vacated.
|
|||||
| Sacramento County Office of Education v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. C031864.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment annulled; as employee failed to request reinstatement of vocational rehabilitation services within five years of the date of her work-related injury, her right to request further benefits terminated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
