 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bravo v. Superior Court, F037557,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Initiative was not an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers doctrine insofar as it permitted prosecution to try youth petitioner as an adult.
|
|||||
| Great W. Bank v. Kong, No. F034149.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Partners who settled with bank creditor and became assignees of a deficiency judgment based on the partnership debt could not enforce that judgment against non-settling partner; trial court erred in ruling that such enforcement was permissible.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Rossi, No. B141041.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to the terms of the applicable statutory provision, ex-husband was properly awarded 100 percent of the lottery winnings that were fraudulently concealed by ex-wife during the parties' dissolution proceedings.
|
|||||
| In re Zeth S., G027568,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where boy's trial counsel sought to have mother's parental rights terminated, and boy's appellate counsel told appellate court that grandfather was pressured into adopting boy, case was remanded for updated review hearing.
|
|||||
| Lewis C. Nelson & Sons v. Clovis Unified Sch. Dist., Nos. F032493, F033135.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court was permitted to impose prejudgment interest on a judgment against a public entity.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
