 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kacha v. Allstate Ins. Co., D046961,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insured did not waive the rule that an appraisal panel's authority was limited to determining actual cash value of an insured item because the purported waiver in the appraisal award form did not comply with the Ins. Code, § 2071, subd. (a), which required a fire insurance policy to state that no waiver was valid unless granted in the policy.
|
|||||
| People v. Romero, B185902,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Specific intent element of Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1), requiring a showing of specific intent to promote, further, or assist in any criminal conduct by gang members, was satisfied where defendant had the specific intent to promote, further, or assist a codefendant in the shootings of two members of a rival gang.
|
|||||
| People v. Thompson, S130174,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Suppression of evidence seized during and after warrantless entry into defendant's house under Fourth Amendment was error because exigent circumstances justified entry to effect his arrest for DUI. Officers had probable cause to arrest defendant for DUI, and their entry was reasonable to prevent imminent destruction of evidence of his crime.
|
|||||
| Tortorella v. Castro, B184043,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because any unnecessary surgery was inherently injurious, an expert declaration stating that a doctor's preoperative evaluation fell below the accepted standard of care and that a surgery he performed was unnecessary was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to causation; hence, the doctor was not entitled to summary judgment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
