 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lindstrom v. Hertz Corp., No. B128724.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rental agency was not liable for an accident caused by the driver of a leased car, because the agency's duty of care was limited to determining whether the lessee had a valid driver's license.
|
|||||
| Pac. Bell v. City of San Diego, No. D033640.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an inverse condemnation action, as a public entity, the City of San Diego was strictly liable for damages resulting from a pipe burst that damaged a local telephone company's property.
|
|||||
| People v. Ranger Ins. Co., Nos. B128613, B129250.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Surety's declaration that it had located suspect's address in Mexico was insufficient for good cause to extend time to exonerate bond for another 180 days; should have explained efforts to locate him and why they were unsuccessful.
|
|||||
| Plaza Freeway v. First Mt. Bank, No. E025404.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was estopped from contradicting termination date set forth in estoppel certificate. Estoppel certificate was a written instrument, and trial court erred by ruling that defendant was not guilty of unlawful detainer.
|
|||||
| Tahoe Vista Concerned Citizens v. County of Placer, No. C032876.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action challenging the issuance of a conditional use permit, the exhaustion doctrine prevented plaintiffs who failed to raise an issue in an administrative appeal from raising that issue in a subsequent court challenge.
|
|||||
| Fraley v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. D032817.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The insurance policy required insureds to comply with the 180-day period for full replacement costs benefits; insurer did not misrepresent the terms of the policy, and insureds' claims were barred as a matter of law.
|
|||||
| Geneva Towers Partnership v. City and County of San Francisco, A088355,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An action for recovery of excess taxes was barred by the statute of limitations, because suit was not commenced within four years of accrual.
|
|||||
| People v. Velasquez, B135939,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A criminal appeal was dismissed because a judgment of conviction entered on a defendant's plea of guilty was not a conviction warranting relief on appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
