 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Case v. Lazben Financial Co., No. B143295.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Provision of civil procedure code denying subsequent applications for a motion did not apply to trial court's reconsideration of an interim order on its own motion. Thus, trial court had authority to correct its prior order denying motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| DMC, Inc. v. Downey Savings & Loan Assn., No. E030072.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the result of a foreclosure and repurchase, plaintiff's original senior lien was satisfied, and a new lien was created. Assuming that plaintiff's lien reattached, defendant's new purchase-money lien had priority over any revived junior lien.
|
|||||
| In re Brittany L., No. B154167.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was found guilty of vandalism, it was error to not order restitution without regard to potential third party reimbursement, as well as to not consider defendant's evidence challenging necessity and amount of claimed repair costs.
|
|||||
| Low v. Golden Eagle Ins. Co., No. A091934.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The insurer in conservation was not required to provide the insured a defense in a third party lawsuit for damages filed against the insured by a consumer of one of its products.
|
|||||
| People v. Farnam, No. S010808.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a murder defendant argued the trial court erred in denying his challenge for cause to four jurors, the trial court did not exceed its discretion in finding that none of the jurors held an unalterable preference for the death penalty.
|
|||||
| People v. Smith, B142943,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants intended to permanently deprive officers of property; thus, they were guilty of theft. Because the only objective for using 85 kilos of cocaine in a sting was enhancement of defendants' sentences, officers engaged in sentence manipulation.
|
|||||
| People v. Wright, No. H022452.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to have entry of judgment deferred, and the State was entitled to appeal the trial court's order granting defendant's motion.
|
|||||
| Rice v. Clark, No. S097456.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where contingent beneficiary sought declaration that donative transfers made to primary beneficiaries were invalid, amendments to statute, eliminating persons who caused instrument to be drafted, applied to disputed donative transfers.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
