|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
California - June 2, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gonzalez v. Kalu, B183467,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 2, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Summary judgment against client in legal malpractice suit was error; there were triable issues of fact as to whether lawyer continued to represent her during time he failed to communicate with her, which would toll limitations period, Code Civ. Proc., § 340.6, and whether such continuing representation was for period sufficient to make suit timely.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|