|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - May 11 - May 14, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Kintetsu Enterprises of America, B158840,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, May 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In consumer advocacy groups action alleging violations of Proposition 65 by hotels and retail establishments, group had served invalid notice under Cal. Code Regs., tit. 22, ? 12903, on several of the defendants because it failed to specify the route of exposure; notice had to inform defendants and public prosecutor of nature of alleged violation.
|
|
| |
Loggins v. Kaiser Permanente Internat., D048404,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Employer was entitled to summary judgment on claims of retaliatory employment termination in violation of Gov. Code, ? 12940, subd. (h), and wrongful employment termination in violation of public policy; the temporal proximity of a discrimination complaint and the adverse action did not, in itself, raise a triable issue of fact as to pretext.
|
|
| |
Nguyen v. Superior Court, G038475,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a case involving an election contest over a seat on a county board of supervisors, the losing candidate's petition for a writ of mandate was denied because Elec. Code, ? 16900, afforded the losing candidate a clear remedy by way of appeal.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback