 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriage of Gong & Kwong, A114589,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 29, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a father's appeal from an order that denied his motion to end payments under a charging order issued to enforce child support obligations lacked merit and was prosecuted solely for the purpose of delay, the appeal was frivolous, and monetary sanctions were warranted under Code Civ. Proc., ¿ 907, and Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.276(e)(1).
|
|||||
| People v. Delgado, S141282,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 29, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An abbreviated notation on an abstract of judgment that described defendant's prior crime as "Asslt w DWpn" was sufficient to prove defendant's prior conviction had occurred under the deadly weapon prong of Pen. Code, ¿ 245, subd. (a)(1), and was for a serious felony.
|
|||||
| People v. Miles, S140413,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 29, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's judgment form describing his offense of conviction under former 18 U.S.C. ¿ 2113(a) as bank robbery and indicating that it involved aggravating conduct, described as arming and kidnapping, provided sufficient evidence under Pen. Code, ¿¿ 667, 1170.12, subds. (a)-(c), that the conviction corresponded to a California serious felony.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
