 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ameron Internat. Corp. v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania, A109755, A112856,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insured contractor was entitled to coverage from certain commercial general liability policies for a settlement arising from a hearing before the U.S. Department of Interior Board of Contract Appeals (IBCA) because the policy defined suit as a civil proceeding and the IBCA proceeding was a civil proceeding within the policies' coverage.
|
|||||
| People v. Govan, D049586,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The imposition of an upper term sentence for residential burglary was reversible error under the Sixth Amendment because the trial court relied, without jury findings or admissions, on recidivism-related aggravating factors and none of those factors was the mere fact of a prior conviction.
|
|||||
| People v. Pereira , A114794,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a drug case, defendant's use of a fictitious name in sending a package did not establish abandonment of the package under the Fourth Amendment because defendant's telephone calls to the shipper regarding the whereabouts of the package and his other conduct such as obtaining a tracking number objectively demonstrated a continuing interest in it.
|
|||||
| People v. Sayres, B188303,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a rape case, any Sixth Amendment error by the trial court in imposing the upper term based on sentencing factors, other than prior convictions, not found by the jury was harmless error; defendant's prior prison term and his pattern of violent conduct were proper sentencing factors because they were derived from defendant's prior convictions.
|
|||||
| People v. Thoma, No. B170355,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence in a drug case was insufficient to establish that defendant had a prior strike conviction because the record of his prior conviction under Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a), for driving under the influence causing bodily injury did not establish that he caused great bodily injury; an alleged admission after the plea could not be considered.
|
|||||
| Rondon v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Bd., H030292,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 15, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a liquor license revocation proceeding, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control's practice of allowing its ultimate decision maker to have access to prosecuting attorneys' reports of hearing violated statutory prohibitions contained in the California Administrative Procedure Act against ex parte communications.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
