 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bisno v. Douglas Emmett Realty Fund 1988, B193604, B195422,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a landlord/tenant dispute, summary adjudication was properly granted to the landlord on the tenant's malicious prosecution claim, because the landlord relied on the advice of counsel when it sought a rent increase to $ 4,295 under the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, even though the lease limited an increase when the unit was sublet to $ 2,000.
|
|||||
| In re A.S., E045331,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which juvenile court had terminated a dependency with respect to father's child, and six years later father filed a petition pursuant to Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388, asking the juvenile court to set aside its original jurisdiction findings, juvenile court should have dismissed father's § 388 petition for lack of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| In re Hovanski, C059192,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate serving remainder of his prison term due to revocation of parole was not subject to illegal parole hold where hold placed on him complied with Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6601.3, because statute authorized Department of Mental Health to extend an inmate's custody for 45 days past his release date for purposes of completing its SVP evaluation.
|
|||||
| Kevin Q. v. Lauren W., G040343,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a voluntary declaration of paternity signed by a child's biological father functioned as a judgment of paternity under Fam. Code, § 7573, a trial court erred in finding that another man was the father of the child under the rebuttable presumption established in Fam. Code, § 7611, subd. (d).
|
|||||
| People v. Valdez, E045289,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 19, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant argued that the prohibition set forth in Pen. Code, § 1203.065, on granting probation to one convicted of rape with a foreign object, or in his case, of raping his wife with a foreign object, violated equal protection because there was no similar prohibition for his rape of his wife, defendant's contention was rejected.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
