 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co., No. S088829.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 13, 2002, Decided , June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an uninsured motorist's action for negligence and premises liability, the uninsured motorist was statutorily barred from seeking non-economic damages.
|
|||||
| City of Malibu v. Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, B151606,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conservancy's petition for rehearing and request to depublish were denied. Appellate court modified prior opinion but did not change judgment. City retained police power to regulate uses on conservancy property.
|
|||||
| Fatica v. Superior Court, No. G030753.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 13, 2002, Decided , June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where victims' treating physician was a testifying witness, physician was considered an expert witness and trial court erred in granting motion in limine which limited physician to testify only as a percipient witness.
|
|||||
| Kong v. City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment Agency, No. B146142.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 13, 2002, Decided , June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a sublessee failed to allege facts to establish damages as the result of a taking, the trial court properly sustained a city's demurrer to the cause of action for inverse condemnation, but it did so improperly without leave to amend.
|
|||||
| Kong v. City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment Agency, No. B149322.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 13, 2002, Decided , June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Businessman, who was the sublessee of a piece of commercial property, was a "displaced person" within the meaning of the California Relocation Assistance Law and was entitled to relocation benefits due to city agency's acquisition of the property.
|
|||||
| People v. Carmony, No. C035540.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 13, 2002, Decided , June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Collateral estoppel did not apply to bar a sexually violent predator proceeding because of the changeable nature of a person's mental health and dangerousness, the laws emphasis on a defendant's current, continuing threat to society.
|
|||||
| People v. Mack, C037421,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas relief vacated conviction. On return, defendant pled guilty and got credit on new sentence. This was upheld except for a determination on remand of conduct credits due him, per statutory standards, for state prison time prior to reversal.
|
|||||
| People v. Sinohui, No. S094039.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 13, 2002, Decided , June 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A wife's testimony was properly compelled, pursuant to spousal testimony privilege exception, where defendant's crimes against his wife and victim were part of a continuous course of criminal conduct and bore a logical relationship to each other.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
