 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adelman v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co., No. B130210.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer of homeowners' association was not liable to individual condominium owners for the negligent failure to repair the common areas of the project following earthquake damage; no special relationship was demonstrated.
|
|||||
| Chateau Chamberay Homeowners Ass'n v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co., No. B137320.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where homeowners association was underpaid for earthquake loss claim and sued insurer for breach of contract and bad faith, there was genuine dispute as to amount of loss, and insurer could not be found liable in bad faith.
|
|||||
| Conservatorship of Ramirez, No. B145896.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The probate court erred prejudicially in appointing respondents as the permanent conservators of an incompetent's estate; there was no evidence that appellant ever did anything but take good care of the incompetent.
|
|||||
| Holmes v. Cal. Nat. Guard, No. A083451, No. A085180.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State national guard's "don't ask, don't tell" policy violated plaintiff's rights under state constitution, but ruling was limited to employment and service in state active duty positions not requiring federal recognition.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Copeman, No. A091020.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Laches applied to action for over 10 years of child support arrearages. Delay due to mother's "passive personality," desire to avoid conflict, and ignorance of assistance was unreasonable, and father was unduly prejudiced thereby.
|
|||||
| People v. Gibson, No. B141781.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where madam was convicted of pimping, warrant's information was not stale; madam was not denied due process as to jury instruction; and no lesser-included offense instruction on aiding and abetting prostitution was needed.
|
|||||
| Santa Ana Unified Schoold Dist. v. Orange County Dev. Agency, No. G027331.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment ordering county and development agency to pay certain property tax revenues to school district was proper because allocation and payment of such funds was mandatory, making school district's election automatic.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
