 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Angela C., No. F039609.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 14, 2002, Decided , June 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure to notify mother of continued termination of parental rights hearing date was harmless error, where mother received proper notice of original hearing and was unlikely to prevail on adoptability and detriment arguments.
|
|||||
| People v. Manderscheid, No. B153757.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 14, 2002, Decided , June 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Facts which contained exigent circumstances including a law enforcement need to apprehend an absconding parolee who was hiding in a home in a residential neighborhood outweighed marginal relevant impact of a trespass into defendant's backyard.
|
|||||
| Satten v. Webb, No. D037375.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 14, 2002, Decided , June 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Federal bankruptcy code sanctions were not an exclusive remedy where a state court fraud action was wrongly brought against a bankruptcy trustee.
|
|||||
| Associated Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Purex Industries, Inc., B149365,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurer covered corporations that repaired airplane engines, those corporations were restructured, and new and existing corporations were sued for claims from old business, insurer had to defend and indemnify existing and new corporations.
|
|||||
| People v. Johnson, No. S097857.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 17, 2002, Decided , June 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because continuous sexual abuse of child statute clearly mandated charging of continuous sexual abuse and specific sexual offenses, pertaining to same victim over same time period, only in the alternative, multiple convictions could not be obtained.
|
|||||
| People v. Mora, Nos. D039073, D039527.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 17, 2002, Decided , June 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was reversed, where the trial court resentenced defendant in his absence.
|
|||||
| Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc., No. S100352.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 17, 2002, Decided , June 17, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where sign maker sued company for breach of contract, and sign maker's attorney sent company an offer of settlement, which mistakenly offered settlement against sign maker, attorney who made erroneous offer could obtain relief to set aside judgment.
|
|||||
| Graber v. City of Upland, No. E029769.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 18, 2002, Decided , June 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a city adopted ordinances in connection with a redevelopment plan in an improper attempt to change the base year limitations for a particular parcel, the trial court correctly invalidated the ordinances.
|
|||||
| Risam v. County of Los Angeles, No. B151329.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 18, 2002, Decided , June 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted the county's summary judgment motion, as the employee failed to timely appeal an administrative commission's adverse findings that she had not proved violations of the ADA or FEHA.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
