 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. Superior Court, C037025,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Act requiring coverage for women's contraceptives had a secular purpose, did not advance or inhibit religion, and did not foster excessive government entanglement with religion; thus the act did not violate constitutional religious guarantees.
|
|||||
| Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo, No. S089226.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Proof of actual innocence was a prerequisite to recovery for malpractice against defense attorney, but statute of limitations was tolled while pursuing postconviction remedies, and plaintiff should have been allowed to amend complaint.
|
|||||
| In re Walter S., B144386,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, July 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Martin, No. S087880.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, July 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where man's girlfriend gave him drugs she found in son's room, and police found those drugs on man's person, transitory possession defense applied only to momentary or transitory possession of drugs for purpose of disposal.
|
|||||
| Barnett v. Penske Truck Leasing, No. B140195.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, July 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sanctions under statute for expenses of making proof were available to truck owner after successful motion for summary judgment because the motion proved there were no triable issues of material fact.
|
|||||
| Hicks v. Kaufman & Broad Home Corp., B139140,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, July 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Pollard, No. C034440.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, July 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bail bondsman had no legal interest in property quitclaimed by client who bought it with embezzled funds, as he knew of State's lis pendens and deed was void ab initio. Court had in rem and personal jurisdiction; bondsman received due process.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
