 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Jenkins, C059321,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 25, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate subject to nonadverse transfer was not entitled to additional work/school performance points for time he did not actually participate in a work, school, or vocational program; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, § 3375.4, specified that favorable points should not be granted for average or above average performance for inmates not assigned to program.
|
|||||
| Komarova v. National Credit Acceptance, Inc., A121316, A122041,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 25, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute of limitations did not bar debt collection claims for harassing phone calls to an employer, even if the collection target had stopped working there, because Civ. Code, § 1788.11, subd. (e), did not require that a plaintiff answer harassing collection calls before they could be actionable. The calls were a continuing course of conduct.
|
|||||
| People v. Dieck, S158076,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 25, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Pen. Code, § 4019, entitled a defendant to conduct credit if he was sentenced to, or otherwise committed for, at least six days, without regard to duration of presentence confinement, defendant was entitled to conduct credit based on five days he spent in presentence custody; thus, court erred in awarding credit only for actual time served.
|
|||||
| State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Mintarsih, B202888,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 25, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in finding that an insurer was obliged to provide coverage for compensatory damages awarded against its insureds in their domestic servant's underlying action arising from her employment because Ins. Code, § 533, precluded indemnity for the compensatory damages awarded against the insureds for false imprisonment and negligence.
|
|||||
| Terry v. Slico, A123310,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 25, 2009, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because, pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 2020.510, service of a deposition subpoena on a nonparty witness was effective despite the absence of a supporting affidavit or declaration, a trial court did not err in imposing reasonable monetary sanctions for his failure to comply with the subpoena demanding his testimony and the production of documents.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
