 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bell v. Vista Unified Sch. Dist., No. D033824.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: School district employees presenting of outside eligibility-federation's charges on employee coach in a closed board meeting required that the coach receive 24 hour notice; damages for that violation had to be apportioned from other tort claims.
|
|||||
| In re Vargas, B137582,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for habeas corpus was granted and matter remanded for evidentiary hearing where it appeared that defense attorney conducted no investigation, was not prepared for trial, and did not adequately advise concerning plea.
|
|||||
| People v. Bracken, No. BR39807.,
APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, June 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was reasonable suspicion for a vehicle stop when appellant's vehicle weaved while it was being followed by a police officer and the cause of the weaving was probably a driver under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
|
|||||
| Cerritos Valley Bank v. Stirling, No. B133888.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent's predefault waiver of the requirement of notice of sale of collateral was void as a matter of law, and appellant failed to demonstrate any triable issues of material fact on the issues of waiver or estoppel.
|
|||||
| Freis v. Soboroff, No. B123194.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A taxpayer who refused to provide a social security number had no cognizable claim against defendants that withheld a portion of royalties payments as backup withholding for federal income taxes.
|
|||||
| Ludgate Ins. Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. H018333.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant satisfied the requirements of stating a claim for declaratory relief against plaintiff in its fifth amended cross-complaint, trial court's decision to the contrary constituted clear error.
|
|||||
| Marylander v. Superior Court, No. B138779.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner sought production of memoranda from state agency to governor's office, relevant to his defense, trial court was required to balance need for disclosure against public interest in confidentiality.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
